🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from disorder. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of candidates. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the process said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it might seek to question.