🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.