🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful first step," stated one MEP behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations take a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this global conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.